![]() ![]() ![]() Knowlton did not accept the drawbacks of his leadership style which were revealed to him with references to Remington’s approach. Thus, the key issue associated with Knowlton’s case is his ineffective leadership which can be discussed as the leader’s inability to accept the undesirable situation, to face challenges, to work at overcoming the problem and improving the leadership style. Being unable to compete with Remington, Knowlton chose to leave the project and his position in the Si-Tech Laboratories.Īs a result, the situation revealed such a problem experienced by Knowlton as the inability to accept his weaknesses and fears and transform the leadership strategy in order to achieve the higher results while leading the team. Remington demonstrated the unique approach to solving the project problems in contrast to Knowlton’s traditional approach. From this perspective, the introduction of Jack Remington as a new leader to work in the project team made Knowlton fear about his position and leadership. Knowlton demonstrated the perfect understanding of the principles of the project development, he could work with the team to achieve the high results, and he was oriented to using the traditional methods in order to reach the set goals. ![]() Bob Knowlton was appointed to be the project head in the Si-Tech Laboratories. However, there are often cases when weak leaders lose their opportunities to contribute to the organisational development in order to create the effective workplace environment and achieve set goals and objectives. Effective leadership is an important aspect to speak about the progress of modern organisations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |